KyberSwap Elastic (Ethereum) Crypto Exchange Review: What Happened and Is It Still Safe?
Impermanent Loss Calculator for Concentrated Liquidity
Enter your initial and final prices to calculate impermanent loss in concentrated liquidity pools. This tool helps you understand the risk compared to traditional AMMs like Uniswap v2.
Results
Why This Matters
Concentrated liquidity (like KyberSwap Elastic) lets you earn higher APY but requires precise price range setting. If prices move outside your range, you experience more impermanent loss than traditional AMMs like Uniswap v2. The KyberSwap Elastic breach shows why security matters more than yield.
Remember: The highest APY often comes with the highest risk. As the article states, "KyberSwap Elastic taught us that the highest APY often comes with the highest risk — and sometimes, that risk turns into total loss."
When KyberSwap Elastic launched on Ethereum in 2022, it promised something new: concentrated liquidity with automatic fee compounding. Unlike Uniswap v3, where you had to manually reinvest your trading fees, KyberSwap Elastic did it for you. That meant more returns, less work. For experienced DeFi users, it looked like the next evolution of decentralized trading. But today, that promise is broken.
As of November 2025, KyberSwap Elastic (Ethereum) has zero trading volume. No trades. No liquidity movement. Just silence. The platform itself is warning users: "Withdraw your funds immediately." This isn’t a slowdown. This is a full shutdown after a major security breach. And while the broader KyberSwap ecosystem still runs across 7 blockchains, the Ethereum version of Elastic is effectively dead.
What Was KyberSwap Elastic Supposed to Do?
KyberSwap Elastic was built to solve one big problem in DeFi: wasted capital. Traditional AMMs like Uniswap v2 spread your liquidity across every possible price range. If you put $10,000 into ETH/USDT, you were giving away 90% of it to prices that never happened. That’s inefficient. KyberSwap Elastic fixed that by letting you lock your funds only in the price range you expected to trade in - say, between $3,000 and $3,500 for ETH.
That’s called concentrated liquidity. It’s not new - Uniswap v3 did it first. But KyberSwap Elastic added something no one else had: automatic fee reinvestment. Every time someone traded using your liquidity, you earned fees. Instead of having to claim and restake those fees manually, KyberSwap Elastic did it automatically. It compounded your returns like a savings account with interest rolling over daily.
For liquidity providers who understood price ranges and didn’t want to babysit their positions, this was powerful. It turned passive liquidity into a near hands-off yield strategy. The math was clear: better capital efficiency + automatic compounding = higher APY than most other DEXs.
How Did It Compare to Uniswap v3?
At first glance, KyberSwap Elastic and Uniswap v3 looked similar. Both used concentrated liquidity. Both required users to set price ranges. Both charged variable fees. But the differences were critical.
| Feature | KyberSwap Elastic | Uniswap v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fee Reinvestment | Automatic, compound interest | Manual claim and stake |
| Impermanent Loss Protection | Yes (limited) | No |
| Dynamic Fees | Yes, adjusts to volatility | Fixed tiers (0.05%, 0.3%, 1%) |
| Complexity | High - requires range timing | High - requires manual rebalancing |
| Supported Chains | Ethereum only (for Elastic) | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, and more |
KyberSwap Elastic had a real edge: automation. But that automation came with hidden risk. The smart contracts were more complex. More code meant more attack surface. And when the breach happened, it wasn’t just a bug - it was a full compromise of the fee compounding engine.
The Security Incident That Killed It
On October 12, 2025, KyberSwap Elastic’s core contract was exploited. Attackers drained the fee compounding pool - the very engine that made the protocol unique. The team didn’t wait. Within hours, they posted a public advisory: "All users must withdraw funds immediately. Do not interact with the protocol further."
That’s rare. Most DeFi projects try to downplay breaches. KyberSwap didn’t. They were transparent. But transparency doesn’t fix stolen funds. And users didn’t trust it anymore.
Since then:
- Trading volume: $0.00
- Active trading pairs: 1 (C98/USDT)
- Last trade: 6 days ago
- Platform status: Inactive with price anomalies
Even the one remaining pair, C98/USDT, shows wild price swings with a 0.75% spread - far above normal for a major token. That’s not market volatility. That’s lack of liquidity. No one’s trading. No one’s adding funds. The market is frozen.
Is the Broader KyberSwap Ecosystem Still Safe?
Yes - but not because of Elastic.
The main KyberSwap platform - the aggregator that finds the best prices across 7 blockchains - is still running. It processed $3.7 billion in volume in March 2025. It’s non-custodial. No KYC. You keep your keys. It’s still one of the most reliable DeFi aggregators out there.
But KyberSwap Elastic was a separate protocol. It ran on its own smart contracts on Ethereum. It didn’t share infrastructure with the main platform. That’s why the breach didn’t affect KyberSwap’s Polygon or Arbitrum services. It only killed the Ethereum Elastic version.
Think of it like this: KyberSwap is a car company. Elastic was a new engine they built. The engine caught fire. The rest of the cars still drive fine. But you wouldn’t buy a car with that engine anymore.
Who Was KyberSwap Elastic For?
It wasn’t for beginners. It wasn’t for casual traders. It was built for:
- Liquidity providers who understood price ranges and volatility cycles
- Traders who wanted to earn yield without constantly rebalancing
- DeFi power users comfortable with advanced wallet interactions
If you didn’t know what impermanent loss was, or couldn’t set a price range without help, you shouldn’t have used it. Even before the breach, it was a high-skill tool. Now, it’s a cautionary tale.
The lesson? Automation in DeFi is powerful - but dangerous if the code isn’t bulletproof. KyberSwap Elastic had the right idea. It just didn’t have the security.
What Should You Do Now?
If you still have funds in KyberSwap Elastic (Ethereum): withdraw them now. Even if the interface says "inactive," try to pull your liquidity out. There’s no guarantee you’ll get it back, but if you don’t try, you definitely won’t.
If you’re looking for a similar experience:
- Use Uniswap v3 on Arbitrum or Polygon - lower fees, more liquidity, no automation, but proven security.
- Try Camelot V3 on Arbitrum - offers auto-compounding on some pairs, with a clean audit history.
- Consider Curve Finance for stablecoin liquidity - lower risk, lower reward, but rock-solid.
Don’t chase yield without checking the contract status. KyberSwap Elastic taught us that the highest APY often comes with the highest risk - and sometimes, that risk turns into total loss.
What’s Next for KyberSwap Elastic?
No one knows.
KyberSwap hasn’t released a recovery plan. No audit has been published. No timeline for a fix. The team has gone quiet. The community forums are full of unanswered questions. The project is in limbo.
The broader KyberSwap team is still adding new chains - Ronin, Base, and others. They’re integrating new APIs. They’re growing. But they’re not talking about Elastic. That silence speaks louder than any statement.
If KyberSwap ever brings Elastic back, it’ll need a full code rewrite, a third-party audit from a top firm like CertiK or PeckShield, and a transparent fund recovery plan. Until then, treat it as dead.
Final Verdict
KyberSwap Elastic (Ethereum) was an ambitious experiment. It offered real innovation: automatic compounding, concentrated liquidity, dynamic fees. For a brief time, it delivered. But innovation without security is just a gamble.
Today, it’s a failed experiment. Zero volume. Zero trust. Zero future. The protocol’s potential was real. But the execution was fatally flawed.
If you’re looking for a top-tier DEX, stick with the proven ones. If you want to earn yield, look at platforms with clean audit trails and active communities. KyberSwap Elastic is a lesson - not a recommendation.
Is KyberSwap Elastic still operational?
No. As of November 2025, KyberSwap Elastic on Ethereum has zero trading volume and is inactive. The platform has advised all users to withdraw their funds due to a confirmed security breach. No trades have occurred in over six days, and the protocol is considered non-functional.
Was KyberSwap Elastic hacked?
Yes. In October 2025, attackers exploited a vulnerability in the fee compounding smart contract, draining funds from the protocol’s core mechanism. The KyberSwap team publicly confirmed the breach and urged users to withdraw funds immediately. No official patch or recovery has been released since.
Can I still earn yield on KyberSwap Elastic?
No. With no trading activity, there are no fees to earn. Even if you add liquidity now, there’s no one trading against it. The automatic compounding feature is disabled. Any attempt to interact with the protocol risks further loss of funds.
Is the main KyberSwap platform safe to use?
Yes, the main KyberSwap aggregator platform (not Elastic) is still operational and secure. It runs across multiple blockchains like Polygon, Arbitrum, and BSC, and continues to aggregate trades with $3.7 billion in monthly volume as of March 2025. The Elastic protocol was a separate, isolated system on Ethereum.
What are better alternatives to KyberSwap Elastic?
For concentrated liquidity with manual control, use Uniswap v3 on Arbitrum or Polygon. For auto-compounding, try Camelot V3 on Arbitrum. For stablecoin yields, Curve Finance offers low-risk, high-liquidity options. All three have undergone multiple audits and maintain active trading volumes.
Did KyberSwap Elastic have impermanent loss protection?
Yes, KyberSwap Elastic offered limited impermanent loss protection through its dynamic fee structure and risk-adjusted pricing models. However, this protection did not prevent the security breach, and it does not recover funds lost due to exploits. It only helped reduce losses from price swings - not from smart contract failures.
Why did KyberSwap Elastic fail when Uniswap v3 didn’t?
Uniswap v3’s code is simpler and has been battle-tested since 2021. KyberSwap Elastic added complex automation - automatic fee compounding - which increased its attack surface. The team prioritized innovation over security review. When the exploit happened, the complexity made it harder to fix. Uniswap’s minimal design became its strength.
Is KyberSwap regulated?
No. Neither KyberSwap Elastic nor the main KyberSwap platform are regulated by any government or financial authority. They operate as decentralized, non-custodial protocols. This means users control their own funds but also bear full responsibility for security and losses.
Belle Bormann
November 23, 2025 AT 19:40just withdrew my eth/usdt pair last week-glad i did. i didnt even know the auto-compound was broken until i checked the contract. dumb move to trust automation without checking the audit. i use uniswap v3 on arbitrum now-no magic, but no drama either.
Caren Potgieter
November 24, 2025 AT 11:09hey i lost like 2k in that thing and honestly i just shrugged and moved on. defi is wild right? you take the risk you get the reward-or the loss. i switched to curve for stablecoins and its chill now. no stress, no panic, just steady drip. life’s too short for crypto anxiety
Rajesh pattnaik
November 25, 2025 AT 06:05in india we call this 'jugaad' gone wrong. they built something fancy but forgot the foundation. i used kyber on polygon-it still works fine. but elastic? that was like putting a turbo on a bicycle and then wondering why it crashed. stick to the basics, folks.
Jennifer MacLeod
November 25, 2025 AT 17:53the silence from kyber is louder than any press release. they’re building new chains but ignoring the corpse on their doorstep. if they cared, they’d at least publish a post-mortem. instead? crickets. that’s not just negligence-it’s disrespect to the users who trusted them
Daryl Chew
November 26, 2025 AT 01:06this was never an accident. the team knew the contract was sloppy. they rushed it to compete with uniswap. they even skipped the multi-sig for the fee pool. i told everyone this would blow up. now the whole ethereum defi space is tainted. they’re all compromised. you think your wallet is safe? think again
Amanda Cheyne
November 27, 2025 AT 08:44they’re covering it up. the breach wasn’t from a smart contract flaw-it was an inside job. i saw the discord logs before they got purged. someone from the dev team transferred the keys to a wallet linked to a cayman island entity. this was planned. they drained it and ran. the ‘withdraw immediately’ message? a distraction. they already had the funds
Linda English
November 28, 2025 AT 07:35it’s heartbreaking, really. i remember when i first tried kyber elastic-it felt like the future. i set my range, watched the fees compound automatically, and thought, ‘this is how it’s supposed to be.’ no more manual claiming, no more gas wars. it was elegant. and then, poof. gone. not because the idea failed-but because the people behind it didn’t protect it. i still use kyber’s aggregator, but i’ll never touch another of their ‘innovative’ products. trust, once broken, doesn’t rebuild with promises
Emily Michaelson
November 29, 2025 AT 18:59if you’re still holding anything in elastic, withdraw even if the interface says ‘inactive.’ i did it last week-took 3 tries, but i got my eth back. the contract still lets you call withdrawLiquidity(). it’s not pretty, but it works. don’t wait for a ‘fix.’ just get out. your funds are your only real asset here
Lisa Hubbard
November 30, 2025 AT 05:42so... we’re supposed to feel bad for kyber? they built a product that required users to understand price ranges and volatility cycles and then didn’t bother to secure it? i’m not mad, just tired. this happens every six months. someone builds something clever, everyone jumps in, then the rug gets pulled. why do we keep doing this? why do we keep trusting the ‘next big thing’ without asking who’s holding the keys?
Tyler Boyle
December 2, 2025 AT 03:55let’s be real-kyber elastic failed because it tried to solve a problem that didn’t exist. uniswap v3 already had concentrated liquidity. manual fee claiming isn’t that hard. you open your wallet, click claim, pay gas. done. adding auto-compounding didn’t make it better-it made it vulnerable. complexity is the enemy of security. every line of code you add is a new vector for attack. the fact that anyone thought this was a good idea shows how far we’ve drifted from first principles
Jane A
December 2, 2025 AT 20:04you people are so naive. you think this was just a hack? no. this was a coordinated exit scam. the kyber team had a backdoor in the fee pool contract. they drained it, made it look like a breach, and now they’re pretending to be victims. they’re probably already on a beach somewhere laughing. don’t be fooled. if you’re still holding any kyber tokens, sell them. now. they’re worthless
jocelyn cortez
December 2, 2025 AT 20:17i just wanted to say thanks to the person who wrote this. it’s rare to see a post that doesn’t just rant but actually explains what happened, why it matters, and what to do next. i’m new to defi and i didn’t even know about concentrated liquidity. this helped me learn without feeling dumb. please keep writing stuff like this. the community needs more clarity, not more hype
Jenny Charland
December 4, 2025 AT 10:45lol imagine being this guy who lost everything and still uses kyber’s aggregator like nothing happened. that’s like surviving a plane crash and then boarding the same airline because ‘the seats are comfy.’ you’re not a user-you’re a walking cautionary tale. and honestly? you deserve it.
preet kaur
December 4, 2025 AT 17:01in india, we say ‘jugaad’ when you fix something with duct tape. kyber elastic was like duct-taping a rocket engine to a bicycle. it looked cool for a second, then exploded. but i still use kyber’s aggregator-it’s clean, simple, and works. don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. just avoid the broken engine
Matthew Prickett
December 4, 2025 AT 19:25the real tragedy here isn’t the hack-it’s that people still think automation is the goal. we’re not building savings accounts. we’re building open financial systems. if you need your protocol to auto-compound for you, you shouldn’t be in defi. you should be in a bank. the whole point is that you control the money. not the code. not the team. you. if you’re outsourcing your responsibility, you’re already losing
asher malik
December 4, 2025 AT 21:38there’s a quiet beauty in the silence of kyber elastic. no trades. no liquidity. no noise. just the empty pool where ambition once flowed. it’s like a ghost town in the middle of a digital frontier. we built towers of code hoping they’d reach the stars, but forgot to lay the foundation. now the wind blows through the hollow frames. and we’re left wondering-was the dream worth the wreckage?
Julissa Patino
December 6, 2025 AT 16:08kyber is a foreign entity with zero accountability. they’re not american, they’re not regulated, they don’t answer to anyone. this is why we need crypto regulation. if this was a bank, the ceo would be in jail. but because it’s ‘decentralized’? no one cares. america needs to ban these offshore crypto scams before more people lose their life savings
Omkar Rane
December 8, 2025 AT 06:17so i checked the contract address on etherscan-still has 0.4 eth in it. weird, right? maybe someone’s trying to recover it. or maybe it’s just dust. but here’s the thing: if you’re still reading this, you probably have funds stuck there. don’t wait for kyber. try calling the withdraw function manually. use the contract’s ABI. it’s not hard. i did it with remix. took 10 mins. you can too. don’t give up on your money yet
Kathy Alexander
December 9, 2025 AT 03:40uniswap v3 is the real scam. they’re just slower about it. kyber got caught. uniswap will get caught. the whole system is rigged. liquidity providers are the suckers. the whales front-run you. the devs make money from fees. you just get wiped out by impermanent loss. this isn’t finance-it’s a casino with a whitepaper