What is Portuma (POR) crypto coin? All you need to know about the low-cap metaverse ad token

POR Portfolio Value Calculator

Portfolio Value Calculator

Portuma (POR) is currently trading at approximately $0.00009265 as of November 5, 2025. The all-time high was $0.004145 in June 2022, representing a 97.8% loss from peak value. This calculator helps you understand the real value of your POR holdings.

$

Portuma (POR) is a cryptocurrency that claims to be the first ingame and metaverse ads token on blockchain. But behind that bold claim, there’s very little substance. If you’re wondering whether POR is worth your time or money, the short answer is: proceed with extreme caution.

What Portuma (POR) Actually Is

Portuma operates as an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain. That means it follows the same technical standard as thousands of other tokens - no special tech, no unique architecture. It doesn’t have its own blockchain. It doesn’t run on Solana, Binance Chain, or anything else. Just Ethereum. That’s it.

The project says it’s designed to power advertising inside games and virtual worlds. Think of it like this: if you’re playing a metaverse game and see a virtual billboard for a sneaker brand, POR is supposed to be the token that pays the ad seller and rewards the player who sees it. Sounds cool in theory. But here’s the problem - no one has seen it actually work.

There’s no public demo. No game integrates POR. No developer has released a plugin. No partnership with a metaverse platform like Decentraland or The Sandbox has been confirmed. The official website, portoken.com, offers no whitepaper, no technical docs, no API references. Just a landing page with vague promises and a Twitter account with 127 followers and no posts since June 2023.

Market Data: A Picture of Instability

As of November 5, 2025, Portuma trades at around $0.00009265. That’s less than one-hundredth of a cent. Sounds cheap, right? But low price doesn’t mean low risk - it often means the opposite.

Here’s what the numbers tell you:

  • Market cap: Around $250,000 - less than the cost of a modest house in some U.S. cities.
  • Circulating supply: Conflicting reports. CoinPaprika says 3.78 billion tokens. Coincodex says 2 billion. No one agrees.
  • 24-hour trading volume: Between $20,000 and $120,000 across platforms. That’s tiny. For comparison, Bitcoin trades over $20 billion daily.
  • Price history: Hit an all-time high of $0.004145 in June 2022. That’s over 44 times higher than today’s price. Since then, it’s been a steady decline.

One day, CoinGecko reports $118,634 in volume. The next, it’s $13,660. That kind of inconsistency is a red flag. It suggests either fake trading or bots moving the price around to create the illusion of activity.

Where Can You Buy POR?

You won’t find Portuma on Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, or any other major U.S. exchange. The only platform with any real trading activity is MEXC, a lesser-known exchange based outside the U.S. and not regulated by the SEC.

Some sources say it’s also on PancakeSwap V2 (on BSC), but CoinGecko doesn’t confirm this. Even if you find a listing, the liquidity is so thin that buying or selling more than a few hundred dollars’ worth could crash or spike the price dramatically. You might not get filled at the price you expect. Slippage could be 20% or more.

A cracked wallet spilling POR tokens into darkness, surrounded by faded crypto platform icons.

Why No One Talks About It

If a crypto project is legitimate, you’ll see:

  • Developers posting code on GitHub
  • Community discussions on Reddit or Discord
  • News coverage from CoinDesk, Cointelegraph, or Decrypt
  • Analysts writing reports

Portuma has none of these. Reddit has zero active threads. GitHub shows a basic repo with no commits since 2022. CoinDesk listed a token called “PORTU” at $0.0000493 - different ticker, different price. That’s not a typo. It’s confusion. And confusion is the enemy of trust.

Even the price predictions you see online - like “POR will hit $1.36 by 2025” - come from obscure sites like WalletInvestor with zero transparency. No formulas. No data. Just numbers pulled out of thin air. These aren’t forecasts. They’re wishful thinking.

The Bigger Problem: No Use Case

The whole idea of blockchain-based in-game advertising sounds promising. But if you’re going to build a token for ads, you need:

  • Game developers who want to use it
  • Ad buyers who trust it
  • Players who actually get paid
  • A working system that tracks views, clicks, and rewards

Portuma has none of that. There are no case studies. No screenshots of ads running in games. No developer documentation. No API. No wallet integration guides. Nothing.

Compare that to Basic Attention Token (BAT), which powers ads in the Brave browser and pays users over $100 million since 2018. BAT has real adoption. POR has zero.

A person holding a fake POR price prediction ticket while shadowy figures run away.

Is Portuma a Scam?

It’s not officially labeled a scam. But it ticks every box of a high-risk, low-transparency micro-cap token:

  • No team name or background
  • No whitepaper
  • No code activity
  • No real partnerships
  • Conflicting data across platforms
  • Extreme volatility with no clear catalysts
  • Minimal community engagement

According to Messari’s 2024 Crypto Failure Report, 92% of tokens with market caps under $500,000 fail within 18 months. Portuma’s market cap is under $300,000. It’s been around since 2022. That puts it in the danger zone.

The SEC has cracked down on dozens of micro-cap tokens for being unregistered securities. Portuma hasn’t been targeted - but that’s not because it’s safe. It’s because no one’s paying attention to it yet.

Who Should Avoid POR?

If you fall into any of these categories, stay away:

  • You’re looking for a long-term investment
  • You want to use it for in-game purchases or advertising
  • You’re new to crypto and don’t understand risk
  • You need liquidity - meaning you might need to sell quickly
  • You prefer regulated, transparent projects

Even experienced traders treat tokens like POR as gambling chips, not assets. If you’re going to buy it, treat it like buying a lottery ticket - not an investment.

Final Verdict

Portuma (POR) is a speculative token with no real product, no team, no adoption, and no future in sight. Its claim to be the “first metaverse ad token” is empty without evidence. The price is low, but that’s because no one believes in it.

There’s no reason to hold POR. No reason to trade it. And no reason to believe any of the hype around it. The only people benefiting from POR right now are the ones who bought it early and sold high - and they’re long gone.

If you’re curious about blockchain-based advertising, look at BAT, Fetch.ai, or even established metaverse platforms with real user bases. Don’t waste your time on a token that doesn’t exist outside of a price chart.

Is Portuma (POR) a good investment?

No. Portuma has no real use case, no team, no code activity, and almost no trading volume. Its market cap is under $300,000, and it’s lost over 97% of its value since its peak. It’s a high-risk, zero-reward asset. Don’t invest money you can’t afford to lose.

Can I buy Portuma on Coinbase or Binance?

No. Portuma is not listed on any major U.S.-regulated exchange like Coinbase, Binance.US, Kraken, or Gemini. The only exchange with any meaningful trading is MEXC, which is not available in the U.S. and lacks regulatory oversight.

Does Portuma have a whitepaper or technical documentation?

No. The official website, portoken.com, provides no whitepaper, no developer guides, no API docs, and no technical details. No authoritative source has published a whitepaper for POR. This lack of transparency is a major red flag in crypto.

Why is the price so volatile?

Because of extremely low liquidity. With only $20,000-$120,000 traded daily across all platforms, even small buy or sell orders can swing the price by 10-20%. This isn’t normal market behavior - it’s manipulation or bot activity. There’s no real demand driving the price.

Is Portuma related to the metaverse?

Only in name. Portuma claims to be a metaverse ad token, but there’s zero evidence it’s used in any game, virtual world, or platform. No partnerships, no integrations, no developer tools. It’s marketing without substance.

What’s the difference between POR and BAT (Basic Attention Token)?

BAT is a real, working token used in the Brave browser to pay users for viewing ads. It has over $250 million in market cap, partnerships with major publishers, and active developer support. POR has none of that. BAT has adoption. POR has only a price chart.

19 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Robin Hilton

    November 6, 2025 AT 03:03

    This POR token is a joke. No whitepaper, no team, no code updates since 2022? And you’re telling me this is the future of metaverse advertising? Come on. If this were a startup pitch in Silicon Valley, the investors would’ve laughed and thrown the deck in the trash. Zero substance. Just a price chart and a Twitter account that hasn’t posted in two years. Don’t waste your time.

  • Image placeholder

    Grace Huegel

    November 6, 2025 AT 21:03

    I find it fascinating how people still fall for these micro-cap tokens. It’s not even about the money anymore-it’s about the psychological need to believe in something, anything, that might ‘change everything.’ Portuma is a mirror. It reflects our collective desperation for the next big thing, even when all the evidence says it’s empty.

  • Image placeholder

    Nitesh Bandgar

    November 7, 2025 AT 02:42

    Ohhh, here we go again!!! Another ‘revolutionary’ token with ZERO real-world utility!!! No GitHub commits since 2022?? No whitepaper?? No partnerships?? No developers?? Just a website that looks like it was built in 2017 using Wix?? And you’re seriously considering investing??? This isn’t crypto-it’s a digital pyramid scheme with a fancy name!!!

  • Image placeholder

    Jessica Arnold

    November 7, 2025 AT 11:09

    The ontological void of POR is emblematic of late-stage crypto capitalism: a signifier without a signified. It performs the aesthetics of innovation-‘metaverse ads,’ ‘blockchain rewards’-but lacks any material substrate. The token is a spectral commodity, a phantom value generated by liquidity arbitrage and algorithmic noise. It doesn’t exist as a tool; it exists as a signal for speculation. The market doesn’t believe in POR. It believes in the *idea* of POR.

  • Image placeholder

    Chloe Walsh

    November 9, 2025 AT 10:14

    So basically it’s a ghost coin... no team... no code... no game... no future... just a price chart that’s been slowly dying since 2022 and everyone’s pretending it’s a diamond in the rough... I mean come on... this is why people think crypto is a scam... it’s because it is... just look at this mess

  • Image placeholder

    Stephanie Tolson

    November 10, 2025 AT 04:45

    If you’re new to crypto and you’re even considering POR, please take a step back. There are real projects out there building actual tools-BAT, Fetch.ai, even Chainlink. They have teams, documentation, and users. POR has a Twitter account with 127 followers and a website that looks like a placeholder. Don’t gamble your savings on vaporware. There’s no shame in walking away.

  • Image placeholder

    Anthony Allen

    November 10, 2025 AT 23:09

    Yeah I checked MEXC just out of curiosity. The order book is so thin I could push the price 15% with a $500 buy. And the ‘volume’? Probably bots. I’ve seen this movie before. The only people winning are the ones who dumped early. Everyone else gets stuck holding a digital rock.

  • Image placeholder

    Megan Peeples

    November 12, 2025 AT 05:56

    And yet... people still buy it. Why? Because they’re desperate. They want to believe. They want to think ‘this could be the one.’ But it’s not. It’s just a slow-motion collapse wrapped in blockchain buzzwords. The fact that CoinGecko even lists it is embarrassing. They should remove it. It’s not a cryptocurrency-it’s a cautionary tale.

  • Image placeholder

    Sarah Scheerlinck

    November 13, 2025 AT 21:07

    I used to get excited about crypto too. Then I realized most projects are just marketing. POR is the perfect example. No one’s using it. No one’s building with it. No one’s even talking about it. If a project can’t attract a single developer or game studio after three years, maybe it’s not the future. Maybe it’s just noise.

  • Image placeholder

    karan thakur

    November 13, 2025 AT 23:53

    This is a classic pump-and-dump orchestrated by offshore shell companies. The SEC is asleep at the wheel. They’re letting these micro-caps float like ghosts on the blockchain while real investors lose everything. The fact that this is still trading at all proves the system is broken. And the people promoting it? They’re the same ones who sold Bitcoin at $3K and now sell ‘the next big thing’ every six months.

  • Image placeholder

    Evan Koehne

    November 15, 2025 AT 03:57

    Portuma: the crypto equivalent of a fidget spinner with a blockchain sticker on it. ‘Look! It spins! And it’s on Ethereum!’ No, it doesn’t do anything. It just looks like it might. And somehow, that’s enough for people to throw money at it. I’m not mad. I’m just... impressed by the sheer audacity of the delusion.

  • Image placeholder

    Vipul dhingra

    November 15, 2025 AT 22:09

    You guys are all wrong. POR is undervalued. The metaverse is coming. Everyone says so. The price is low because the whales are accumulating. You think they’re dumb? They know something you don’t. If you’re not buying now you’re missing the boat. The 2022 peak was just the beginning. This is the real dip. Buy the rumor sell the news. I bought 500k POR at 0.00003. I’m holding. You’re just a hater because you didn’t get in early

  • Image placeholder

    Jacque Hustead

    November 17, 2025 AT 07:28

    I appreciate the thorough breakdown. It’s rare to see someone lay out the facts without the hype. I’ve seen too many people get burned chasing these ‘low price = high potential’ coins. POR is a textbook example of why due diligence matters. If you can’t find a single credible source backing it, walk away. There’s no shame in waiting for something real.

  • Image placeholder

    Robert Bailey

    November 19, 2025 AT 03:29

    Just don’t buy it. Seriously. If you’re thinking about it, ask yourself: would I invest in a company with no website, no team, no product, and no customers? Of course not. So why are you doing it with crypto? This isn’t investing. It’s hoping. And hope doesn’t pay bills.

  • Image placeholder

    Wendy Pickard

    November 20, 2025 AT 01:50

    Thank you for writing this. I’ve been seeing people post about POR on my feed and I didn’t know what to say. Now I can just send them this. It’s clear, factual, and doesn’t yell. That’s rare these days. People need to hear this before they lose money.

  • Image placeholder

    Jeana Albert

    November 22, 2025 AT 00:58

    HOW IS THIS EVEN ALLOWED TO EXIST?!?!?!?!? This isn’t crypto-it’s a digital Ponzi with a website built by a 14-year-old using Canva. The fact that anyone’s still trading this is proof that the market is completely broken. Someone needs to expose these people behind this. This is fraud. And you’re all just sitting here like it’s normal. IT’S NOT NORMAL.

  • Image placeholder

    Natalie Nanee

    November 23, 2025 AT 10:18

    Why do people keep falling for this? It’s like watching someone buy a fake Rolex because it looks shiny. POR doesn’t do anything. It doesn’t solve anything. It’s just a number on a chart. And yet, people treat it like it’s the next Bitcoin. I feel sorry for them. Not angry. Just... sad.

  • Image placeholder

    Chris Hollis

    November 24, 2025 AT 00:35

    Market cap under $300k. 24h volume fluctuates between $13k and $118k. No GitHub activity since 2022. No team. No whitepaper. No integrations. No liquidity. No regulation. No future. This isn’t a crypto project. It’s a data point in a behavioral economics study on irrational exuberance.

  • Image placeholder

    Vivian Efthimiopoulou

    November 25, 2025 AT 22:04

    Portuma (POR) exemplifies the collapse of epistemic integrity in decentralized finance. The absence of technical documentation, the opacity of tokenomics, the lack of verifiable development activity, and the reliance on speculative narratives rather than functional utility constitute a systemic failure of accountability. In the absence of transparency, trust cannot emerge. And without trust, there is no market-only illusion. This token is not a failure of engineering. It is a failure of ethics.

Write a comment